Complaint No. CC12600836


         BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
                                               MUMBAI
                                      Complaint No. CC12600836
     Bhavin Ratilal Patel                                          ... Complainant
                                                Versus
     M/s. Rishabraj Balaji Infra                                   ... Respondent
     MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51800024086
     Coram: Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Hon’ble Member – I/ MahaRERA
     Both parties were absent.


                                             ORDER
                                      (Tuesday, 26th May 2026)
                                   (Hearing Through Hybrid Mode)
1.     The complainant above named have filed this online complaint before the
       MahaRERA on 14-02-2026, mainly seeking directions from the MahaRERA, to the
       respondent – promoter, to execute a registered conveyance deed in favour of the
       allottees, as per the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act,
       2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘RERA’), in respect of the respondent’s registered
       project known as “Sankeshwar Darshan” bearing MahaRERA project registration
       No. P51800024086, located at Borivali, Mumbai.


2.     This complaint was heard by the MahaRERA today as per the Circular No. 49 dated
       12-09-2025 issued by MahaRERA for hearing of complaints through Hybrid Mode.
       Both the parties have been issued prior intimation of this hearing, and they were also
       informed to file their written submissions if any. However, despite the notice of
       hearing, both parties remained absent.


3.     However, during the course of hearing, as per the available record, MahaRERA has
       prima facie noticed that the present complaint is wrongly listed for hearing today,
       as it had already been observed in the previous Roznama dated 09-03-2026 passed
       therein that the complaint had become infructuous for the reasons recorded therein.


                                              Page 1 of 2
                                                              Complaint No. CC12600836




4.   Further, on a bare perusal of the record particularly the Roznama dated 09-03-2026,
     it appears that two separate complaints have been filed in respect of the same project
     and arising out of the same cause of action. It is further noticed that Complaint No.
     C12600187 has been filed by the Chairman of the society, whereas the present
     complaint (CC12600836), has been filed by the Secretary of the same society.


5.   In view of the above, it appears that both the complaints pertain to the same grievance
     and filed for seeking substantially identical reliefs on behalf of the same society in
     respect of the said project. Hence, continuation of the present complaint would result
     in multiplicity of proceedings for the same cause of action.


6.   In view of the above facts and observations recorded in the Roznama dated 09-03-
     2026, MahaRERA is of the considered view that the present complaint does not
     survive independently and has become infructuous.


7.   Consequently, the present complaint stands dismissed being infructuous.
                                                                    MAHESH Digitally
                                                                           by MAHESH
                                                                                     signed

                                                                    DINKAR DINKAR    PATHAK
                                                                           Date: 2026.05.27
                                                                    PATHAK 16:55:37 +05'30'

                                                                (Mahesh Pathak)
                                                              Member – 1/MahaRERA




                                           Page 2 of 2