Complaint No. CC006000000500500


   BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
                                          MUMBAI
                        Complaint No. CC006000000500500
  Mehul Kishore Joshi                                          ... Complainant
                                         Versus
  Mukesh Somaiya                                               ... Respondent
  MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51800020773
  Coram: Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Hon’ble Member – I/ MahaRERA
  Both the parties are absent.


                                        ORDER
                                 (Monday, 08th July 2024)
                          (Through Video Conferencing)


1. The complainant above named has filed this online complaint before the
   MahaRERA on 22-05-2024 seeking reliefs from MahaRERA to direct the
   respondent - promoter to handover the possession of his flat and also to pay
   interest for the delayed possession as prescribed under the provision of section
   18 of   the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter
   referred to as ‘RERA’) in respect of the booking of a flat bearing no. -Unit F-3,
   1st floor of Wing C in the respondent’s registered project known as “Alag
   Capital” bearing MahaRERA project registration No. P51800020773 located at
   Mulund West, Mumbai.


2. This complaint was heard on 24-06-2024 as per the Standard Operating
   Procedure dated 12-06-2020 issued by MahaRERA for hearing of complaints
   through Video Conferencing. Both the parties have been issued prior intimation
   of this hearing and they were also informed to file their written submissions if
   any. On that date, the respondent appeared and made his submissions.

                                         Page 1 of 2
                                                       Complaint No. CC006000000500500


     However, the complainant despite notice of hearing remained absent. Hence, in
     compliance of principles of natural justice the matter was adjourned today as a
     last chance to the complainant.


3.    Even today, though the last chance given to the complainant, the complainant
      remained absent. The respondent also remained absent, despite notice. The
      complainant has neither appeared nor has filed any written submissions/
      application on record of the MahaRERA seeking an adjournment, despite the
      fact that the notice for today’s hearing and link to join the virtual hearing was
      duly served upon him. It shows that the complainant is not willing to proceed
      with the matter.


4.    Consequently, the present complaint stands dismissed for default.




                                                              (Mahesh Pathak)
                                                            Member – 1/MahaRERA




                                         Page 2 of 2