2025:BHC-OS:1725-DB

                           apn                                                      55-oswp-403-2024.doc

                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO.403 OF 2024

                      Mewalal Hiralal Shah                                   … Petitioner.

                                V/s.

                      The Chief Executive Officer,
                      Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors.                   … Respondents.



                      Mr. Dileep Satale, i/by Adv. Santosh Sitap for the Petitioner.
                      Adv. Umesh Mankapure, a/w Adv. Bhavika Shinde for Respondent Nos.1
                      & 2.
                      Ms. Rupali Adhate, i/by Adv. Smita Tondwalkar, i/by Adv. Komal Punjabi for
                      Respondent-BMC.
                      Mr. Siddharth Shah, i/by DSK Legal for Respondent No.4.
                      Ms. Ayushi Anandpara, a/w Adv. P. Jain, Adv. Ravi R., i/by Jain Law
                      Partners LLP for Respondent No.5.
                      Mr. Akshay Naidu, i/by Adv. Vishwanath Patil for Respondent No.6.
         Digitally
         signed by
         ASHWINI
ASHWINI H
H        GAJAKOSH
GAJAKOSH Date:
         2025.02.05
         16:05:08
         +0530
                                                              CORAM :   A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                               DATE :   4th February 2025.

                      P.C.:-

                      1)                 Petitioner has already availed the alternate remedy of

                      preferring the appeal before the AGRC against impugned Order dated 24 th

                      February, 2021. The said Appeal is pending for final adjudication before the

                      concerned authority.

                      2)                 In view of the principles of law laid down by the Supreme



                                                                                                              1/2



                               ::: Uploaded on - 05/02/2025                  ::: Downloaded on - 20/06/2025 12:56:18 :::
     apn                                                       55-oswp-403-2024.doc

Court in the case of Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority,

Bombay V/s. Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd. & Ors. reported in (1995) 1 SCC 642,

the Petition at this stage is not maintainable and cannot be entertained.

3)              Petition is accordingly disposed off.



           (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                      (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                         2/2



      ::: Uploaded on - 05/02/2025                      ::: Downloaded on - 20/06/2025 12:56:18 :::