BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
                            MUMBAI

                        Complaint No. CC006000000192637
Mr s. Vaishali Chandrashekhar Patil                     ..Complainant
                   Vs
M/s. Kuber Abhiraj Infra                                ..Respondent

MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51700008998

Coram: Dr. Vijay Satbir Singh, Hon’ble Member – 1/MahaRERA
Mr. Chandrakant Patil appeared for the complainant( Not audible).
None appeared for the respondent.

                                    ORDER
                            (02nd December, 2020)
                         (Through Video Conferencing)


   1. The complainant has       filed this complaint seeking directions from
      MahaRERA to the respondent to pay interest for the delayed possession
      under section 18 of    the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act,
      2016 (hereinafter referred to as RERA) in respect of booking of a flat No.
      A/607, on 6th floor, in the      respondent’s registered project known as
      “Kuber Ganraj” bearing MahaRERA registration No. P51700008998 at
      Thane.




   2. This complaint is heard finally today as per the Standard Operating
      Procedure dated 12-06-2020 for hearing of complaints through Video
      Conferencing. Both the parties have been issued prior intimation of this
      hearing and they were also informed to file their written submissions, if
      any. Accordingly, the husband of the complainant though appeared could
      not be heard due to some technical problem. However, none appeared
      for the respondent, though the hearing notice was duly served upon it.



                                      Page 1 of 2
1. During the course of hearing, it was noticed by MahaRERA according to
  the information available on MahaRERA website that the validity period
  of the said project has already lapsed on 31/12/2019. Further, the
  respondent has not uploaded the Form-4 and occupancy certificate on
  MahaRERA website. Therefore, prima facie, it shows that the project is
  still incomplete.


2. In this regard, the MahaRERA is of the view that the promoter of such
  project should apply to MahaRERA for extension of the project. It should
  also enable the formation of the association of allottees under section
  -11(4)(e) of the RERA by sharing the project related information with all
  the allottees.


3. In view of the aforesaid facts, the respondent is directed to approach
  MahaRERA for extension of the project period or take any other action to
  revive the project giving a definite time-line for its completion within a
  period of one month from the date of this order. The respondent is
  further directed to share the information of allottees with the
  complainant. The association of the allottees can contemplate action
  under section 7 & 8 of the RERA if it so desires.


4. With these directions, the complaint stands disposed of with liberty to
  the complainant to approach MahaRERA for redressal of her grievances,
  if any, after the project is revived, by filing appropriate application in
  the present complaint.




                                                  (Dr. Vijay Satbir Singh)
                                                  Member – 1/MahaRERA



                                Page 2 of 2