BEIORE THE MAHARASHIRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY MUMBAI 1. COMPLAINT NO. CC06000000057486 Papesh Laxman lt{urkutc and 23 others 2. COMPLAINT NO:CC006000000079162 Deepchand Dharna PrajaPati Complainants Kuttr Abhiraj Infra Respondent MahaRERA Regn. No. P51700008qr8 Corum: Sfui. Gautam Chatte4ee, ChairPerson, MahaRERA Complainants (-t) were themselves Present a/w l\'lr. Sachin Tidke, Adv' Complainant (2) was himself present. Respondent was rcPresented by Mr. Vinaya Sakpal, Adv. Order lariiary 21 , 2020 l. The Complainants have booked apa*tnmts, in thc ResPondent's Proiect'Kubcl Ganiaj' situated at village: Titwala, 'faluka: Kalyan, District Thane- 421605' through various registered agreements for sale. The Complainants have stated that the Respondents have delayed the Proi.'ct inoldinatelli and failed to givc Possession as promised in the Agreemcnts forSale. The Complainants haveprayed interalja to dirert the Respondent to handover t}re Posses.sion of t}le aPartments at the eatliest with interest for the Period of Jelar trll possession' 2. Du:ring thc hearing, the advocate for the ResPondent submitted that there are disputes between the l,andowner and the ResPondent, due to which, the landowner is obstructing the Construction u'ork and hence the Proiect work could not be comPleted' 3. On review of the ResPonden(s regishation webpage it is observed that the Proicct far from legistration time Period of December 31, 2019, has laPscd but the project is 1/2 -3 Y_-- coBlplction. Thc promoter has not sought anY extension under section 6 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 201(;- Further, the ResPondent has not uploaded the Awrual Audit Report of statutor)' cA - Form 5 for FY 18-19 till date as required under the provisions of sechon 4(2) I and scction 11(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation anci Developmcnt) Act, 2016 (herein atter rofcrred as the 6aid Act) read with regulation 4 of the MahaRERA Ceneral Regulations, 2017. 4. Since the Respondent hat failed to comPlete the Proicct and the registation Period is also over, the onl]' way forward, at this stage, would be to Protect the dght of the allottees and enable them to form an Association of Allottees (AOA) under the provisions of sechon 7/8 of the said Act to comPlete the Proiect. 5. In view of the above facts, the ResPondent is hereby directed to handover thP Iist of allottees of the said proiect, along with their contact details, to the ComPlainants and other allottees, within 30 da,vs ftom the date o( this order, to enable the allottees to form association of allottees, take an inlormed decision Pertaining to the way forward in the saicl project and also to decide iJ the association of allottees may like to procecd under Section Z8 of the Act as Pei the MahaRERA Order no 8/2019 dated March 29' the 2019 on Revocation of Registration of PtoiecL Thc ResPondent shall also uPload from the Annual Audit Rcport of Statutory CA - Form 5 for FY 18-19 r r'ithin 30 days date of this order. 6. The Respondent nlay seck the aPProval of the association of allottees for older under February 8' 2019 Section 7(3) of the said Act, as per MahaRERA Order no 7/ 201 9 dated on Revocation of Registration of Proiect fol reviving the said Proie(L 7 Consequently, the matters are hereby disPosed of utamChatteiee) NtahaRERA z/2