BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY MUMBAI CoMPLAINT NO. CCOO6oOOOO0I 00595 Bharatbh ushan Suclant Survc ..Conrplainant Versus Karlnr Infrastructure p\.t Ltcl MahaRERA Regn. No. p51700008284 ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Shri Ashok Alaspurkar Atljudicating Officer, lvlahaRERA For Complairrant: appearecl in person For Responcltnt: Adv. Genrirr Vyas h/f Aclv. .fejas Tipre ORDER ABOUT ISSUANCE OFWARRANT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ( Dated 01.04.2022) Bv Final Orcjer datccl 10.09.2020 passecl in tltis nr.ttt(rr. respondent clirected to Pa\r .rmounts to conrplairrant allottee within 30.1"r. / Lrrornoter lvas / t,-,,.,., ,1.," .i;"';; o.i"i It is 'Rls1.,ond"nt by the complainarrt that the respondent has faireci to pav the arnt,urrr ^llege(l called upon to shor'v cause wlrv further action sho;lci not be takcn "r ;"; ;i;;k;. ,.,u. ioi ,.rur-r-.onlptian."'ot ,tr" o..1",- !vithin the stiPxl,11"6 periotl. No salislactorv reasons put lorlh bv th.,re=pondent. No sta' rrrcler trorn Appellate Tri[Tu,al or Competent Court is pricc.d on record. fheier,,,.,, t io= r"ri.*irg o'ra"r, ORDER . lssue of Maharashtra Recovery warrant against the responclent u/s 40 (1) of the RERA read rvith Rule Rules. In view of the above, the non-execution ap;.riication datecl 16.05.2021 3 stands hereby c-lisposecl of. No orcler as to costs. k--z- t 1------.-- (Ashok Alaspurkar) - 4 ' )o> z- Murnbai Adj ud icating Officer, MahaRERA Date:01.04.2022