BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, MUMBAI r. Complaint No. CCoo6ooooool roTo2 Abhishek Raiendra Vispute .... Complainant Versus Karrm lnfrastructure Pvt. Ltd .., Respondent Project Registration No. P5t7oooo8284 Along with 2. ComplaintNo.Ccoo6oooooorool4r Anant Ashok Pandirkar .... Complainant Versus Karrm lnfrastructure Pvt, Ltd. ,... Respondent Proiect Registration No. P5r7oooo8284 Along with J. Complaint No. Ccoo6oooooofl0749 Anudeep Verma Annapurna Verma .... Complainant Versus Kar.m lnfrastructure Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Project Registration No. P517oooo8284 Along with 4. Complaint No, Ccoo6ooooooroo504 Lalu Salunan Kochery .... Complainant Versus Karrm lnfrastructure Pvt, Ltd. ,... Respondent Project Registration No. P5r7ooo08284 Along with 5. Complaint No. Ccoo6ooooooi4og94 Pratiksha Prashant Kubal .... Complainant Versus Karrm lnfrastructure Pvt. Ltd. .... Respondent Project Registration No. P517oooo8284 Coram: Hon'ble Dr. Viiay Satbir Singh, Member - l/MahaRERA Complainant present in person. None appeared for the respondent (. *-. , INTERIM ORDER (22''c November 2019) The complainants have filed these complaints seeking directions from MahaRERA, to the respondent to refund the amounts paid by them to the respondent along with interest and compensation under S€ction-18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, zot6 (hereinafter referred to as "RERA") with respect of booking oftheirflats in the respondent's project known as'rKarrm Gardens-|", bearing MahaRERA proiect registration No. P517oooo8284, situated at Ambarnath. 2. This matter was heard on r't November 2019. During the hearing, the complainants brought to the notice of MahaRERA that they had purchased their respective flats in the respondent's project in the on various dates and also executed respective agreements for sale with respect to the said flats. As per the agreements for sale, the respondent was Iiable to hand over the possession of the flats between the years 2o't4 & 2o15 for individual agreements. But the respondent has failed to hand over the possession of the flats to the complainants till date. Hence the complainants have filed these complaints seeking refund of their amounts paid to the respondent. They also prayed for interest on the total consideration paid along with compensation and cost of complaints, The respondent did not appear for the hearing. 3. In the light of the above, since complainant is seeking refund as well as compensation, the complaint filed by the complainant is transferred to the Adjudicating Officer, Mumbai to take appropriate action as per the sec 18 of the RERA and rules made thereunder. ( Dr. Viiay Satbir Singh ) Member - r/MahaRERA