BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

                                                 MUMBAI

                                   SUO MOTO COMPLAINT NO : 8/2018

Secretary, MahaRERA Versus Karrm lnfrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
                              MahaRERA Reg. No: P51 70000321 5, P51 700008284,

                               P51700009304, P5 1700010325, P5 1700007680

Coram: Shri Gautam Chatterjee, Hon'bte Chairperson
                                                   Order
                                               6thMarch 2018

       section '11(2) of the Reat Estate (Regutation and Devetopment) Act, 2016, states that 'The
       advertisement or prospectus issued or pubtished by the promoter shatl mention prominently the
       website address of the Authority, wherein att detaits of the registered project have been entered
       and inctude the registration number obtained from the Authority and such other matters incidentaI
       thereto'


   2. With a view to having uniformity, MahaRERA had through scrotts on its website
       httDs: / / maharer a. mahaon [r ne. qov. in and atso by sending emails, informed att the
                                                                                                  promoters of

       registered project, the manner MahaRERA Regn No. and MahaRERA website address shoutd be
       disptayed in various advertisements or brochures made by registered promoters.


    3. ln spite of the same, it has come to the notice of MahaRERA that the aforementioned promoter
                                                                                             dated 21't
       has pubtished an advertisement in the newspaper Times of lndia, Mumbai sunday
                                                                                       11 (2) of the Act
       January, 2018. The mentioned advertisement has prima facie viotated the section
       by not mentioning the website address of MahaRERA.


    4. Taking suo moto cognizance of the matter, the promoter was catted upon on 6rh March 2018' by a
                                                                                           of the Provisions of
       notice, to exptain why they shoutd not be penatized for the atteged viotation
       the Act.


    5.onthedateofthehearing,thepromoterappearedandwasrepresentedbytheiradvocate.They
       acceptedthattheattegedviotationsoftheprovisionsoftheActaretotattyinadvertentandthey
       didnothaveanyintentiontoshownon.compliancetowardstheprovisionsoftheActorrulesor
                                                                     apotogy and requested of not imposing
        regutations made there under. They offered unconditionat
        anypenattyfortheattegedviotation.Theyhavefurtherprovidedanundertakingthatnosuch
                                                                promoter wilt strictty compty with the
        viotation of the Act woutd happen in the future and the
        provisions of the Act, rutes, regutations and orders/ circutars
                                                                          issued there   under'
                                                                                                            112
 6. Section 61 of the
                      Act sta           any promoter contrav€
    than that provided
                         ,no"jtut' lt
   sha, be riabre
   estate project as
                    ;ffi ffi::Tff'"L:#,#jf j:ilH:i,""',:'ff.:',il:fi:J:i:
                       determined by the
                                                                per cent' of the
                                                                                   estimated cost of
                                           Authority.                                                   the rear
7. MahaRERA accepts
                     the cor tention of
                                        the promoter that
  of the Act have happened                                the aforesaid viotations
                                                                                           of the provisions
  oF section 61                                                    a token penatty'
                of the o.,, ,-uf't"nt"'uttr' 'nu*r"."'".                        under the provisions
                                       t'o tn"
  2,oo,ooo/ -(Rupees            '"o'"0                      herebY directed
  infuture.
                     two,unfh onry) and
                                            ,"r*;;;;""'"*"ntY
                                                      .oisensure that such
                                                                             to pay a penarty of
                                                                                                   Rs
                                                                           violation is not repeated




                                                                                     (         Chatterjee )
                                                                                   Cha lrperson, Maha
                                                                                                        RERA




                                                                                                   zrz