BEFORE
                  THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
                                      MUN,lBAI

                                     SUO N,{OTU CASE NO: 182 oI2020


     Secretary. Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authodty                          Corllpl;1irlint

                    Versus

      Mr. Daitarray V Bhotu.                                                         Respondent

     l. I larish D. Shcth: & Co. (Chartcrcd AccLruntant)
     2. Anil H. Jain (Project Archite.t)                                             Prcj..t Irrofcssion.rls


     MahaRERA rcgistrationno: P52000011051

     Corum: Shri. Gautarn Chatteiee, Chairperson, MahaRERA
     No1're appcared for Respondent.
     None appealed for Projed's Professionals.



                                                    Order (Ex-Partc)
                                                     N,Iarch 16, 202t)



I       This is a Suo-Motu matter taken up by MahaRERA again-st the Respondenfs 'VaraL.l Plaza',
        wl'ich is registered with ]vlaharera Re#shation No. P52000011051.


2.      On revicrv ol the Responder,(s project registnti(xr, it is observed that t]le proie.t
         relistration of the said project has Lrpsed on De.ember -11, 2018 arld tl1(.rc.r rcr., n.
         extension of lhc LlatL, has been either sought or granied undcr the pr()\.isions ol the Rcal
         Estatr, (Rcgulation anrl Developmcnt) Act, 2t)-16 an.t the rules and regulations n1a.l.
         lhr-rcunder- l.ufiher, thc dctails availaLrlc or1 the proje.t registlation \.r,cbpagc sholL that rhe

         |roje.t is not ]'et confleted. \{oreovei, the Rcspondent has not uploaded ttrc Annual
         Auclit Rcpolt oi St,ltutorv CA - &rrm 5 for. FY t7- lB and Fy 1U-19 till ciate as required uider
         tl-rc pr'61.15iont of se.tion 4(2) 1 a11d s.cliLrn (t) oi the Renl Estatc (Rogulation :rnrl




                                                                                  ll ,,- c' - --t
                                                                                   Y
       Dcvclofmerlt) Act, 2016 r.nd wirh regrlatioll ,l ot the N,tahaRERA C.nerrl l{egulari(rns,
       20'17



 3     Since, tllere l,ave been no online .onplaints filed with N{aiaRERA in this
                                                                            }rrojec, as yct,
       thjs matter \.vas laken up as a Suo lvlotu Complaint and thc Respondent and projc.t
       Professir)nals, associated $.ith the project, were calleLl for the hea ng. No
                                                                                       one apPeared Ior
       the Responclent amd Project Profession"lls, associated with the project in spite ol seNice
                                                                                                       of
       notice.


 .1    At this stage wlren the proiect regishation pedod has lapsed, the onlv wav ior\.{arcl ra,ould
       be to protect the right of rhe allottees and enable them to fo n an Associati'n
                                                                                            of allottees
       who can take an inJormed Llecision regarcling cafiving out fhe L]alan.e work to.omplete
       the project.


5     In view of dre above facts, the Respondent NIr. Dattatrav V Bhoir is herebv directed
                                                                                                      to
      handovrj the li6t oI allottecs of the said projccL along r{ith their contact Lletails, to
                                                                                                  ajl the
      aliottees of the said project, along with a copv of this order, to enable
                                                                                  the allottees to lorm
      al1 association of allottees and th{,reafter take an infc,nned decision
                                                                                 peltaining to the said
      project. Thercafter, the association of allottces may like to procecd under
                                                                                     Section 7/g of the
      Act as per the N,{ahaRERA Order no. 8/2019 dated Nfar.h 29, 2019.

(t    The Respondent is directed to upload tlle Annual Audit Report of StatutorY
                                                                                       CA _ Iorm 5 for
      FY 17-18 ancl IY 1E 19 u,ithin 30 days fiom the date of this Or.ter.


      Consequently, the matter is hereby disposed of




                                                                                  (cn tnrr ( hattericc)
                                                                             Cl;r         Nlahi lil i{A
                                                                            Sr. No.     l0/
            BEFORE TT{E MAHARASH'I'RA REAL ESTATE REGULA'IORY AUTHORITY
                                             MUMBAI

                                            ROZNAMA
                             Date: Monday, February 17, 2020 at 11.00 am

     eqra![
     Shri. Gautam Chattedee, Hon'ble Chairperson

Proposed date    suo uoru    ruo.        /2020
of Completion                          Name,                                  Memo of
                 VAR-4.D PLAZA
                                       Designation,       Rcpresentahve /
31-De.-13                              Contact No.        Counscl /
                 P5200001105r

Respondent 1/    DATTATRAY V
Promoter 1       BHOIR


Project          Harish D. Shett]'&
Professional     Co
CA

Project           NA



Next Date

Promoters/ Project Professionals did not appear

Closed for Exparte Order.




                                                                            , \.\r r, -^,         f
                                                                            Caltam Lhattertee

                                                                           Chairpcrson,MahaRERA